[PLUG] PC Week test NT and RedHat.
Dave Jacoby
jacoby@ecn.purdue.edu
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 11:26:01 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, David wrote:
>In case no one saw,
>http://www.hackpcweek.com/
>they are pitting NT vs. RedHat in terms of security. If you notice though,
>the two sites aren't set up the same, nor have they used similar resources
>in setting up the servers themselves. I don't know if this is supposed to
>be "fair" or what, but just thought I'd point it out.
The other objection to these things is that anyone who could really
beat up a machine would be far better served by exploiting the found
hacks than to turn 'em in for the prize.
>You ever notice how they always pit one OS against another? why not five
>or six? I'd like to see FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. MacOS X server vs. NT vs.
>AIX vs. Digital Unix etc...
I saw something on some site or another, I think Deja, that did that:
did a head-to-head with Solaris, NT, Linux, Be, MacOS and OS/2. I
don't recall how it went.
>David Sierkowski
>calx
--
David Jacoby mailto:jacoby@ecn.purdue.edu
Lead Web Technician, ECE http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~jacoby/
Computer Science Little else matters than to write good code
---------------------------------------------------------------